Vann & Sheridan Attorneys at Law

Options To Purchase In Contracts: Why Courts May Opt Out of Enforcing Them

January 21, 2011

Filed under: Business Law — jrvann @ 7:30 am

James R. Vann

Without a doubt, many of you have come across options to purchase in contracts.  What you may not know about them however, is courts may not always enforce them.  So what do courts examine in determining whether to validate an option to purchase?  The recent North Carolina Business Court case, NRC Golf Course, LLC v. JMR Golf, LLC, offers tremendous insight on this issue.

According to the parties’ contract, plaintiff had the option to purchase a golf course for the “fair market value at exercise date validated by an independent third-party appraisal.”  Plaintiff later offered $750,000—the value of the golf course according to an appraiser—which was refused by defendant who argued the option was invalid.

While North Carolina courts in the past have validated options that leave the purchase price to be determined by an appraisal, the Business Court found that in this instance, the option was not enforceable.  According to the Court, the option “not only lack[ed] a sufficiently definite price term, but also lack[ed] a sufficient method by which to determine the price term.”  Thus, the parties’ method for determining purchase price should have been more clearly stated.

The Court found an additional flaw in that the parties did not draft any terms concerning how to select an appraiser or how to resolve discrepancies between different appraisals.  To deal with the latter situation, the Court suggested having the appraisers pick a third appraiser and having the purchase price be the average of the two closest appraisals.

If you have questions or would like more information please feel free to contact us.

Improve Yourself and Your Business Too!

January 14, 2011

Filed under: Business Law — jrvann @ 10:22 am

James R. Vann

Whenever a new year rolls around, you often hear people making resolutions for themselves.  But wouldn’t it be great if we could improve both ourselves AND our businesses this year?  Such a goal can easily be achieved by formulating a business plan specific to your company.

But what is a “business plan”?  Generally, it is a plan that lays out how to run your business on an annual basis.  However, a comprehensive and effectively designed business plan can accomplish all this and more.  Here are some of the positives that come with drafting a comprehensive business plan:

  • A Sense of Direction: An effective business plan will illustrate: (1) the current state of your company; (2) your future hopes for your company; and (3) the means you aim to use to get there.
  • Management on The Offense Instead of Defense: A well-constructed business plan allows management to spot potential problem areas in advance while they are still on paper instead of having to clean them up after they come to fruition in real life.
  • Better Communication: A comprehensive business plan allows the drafter to truly come to grips with his/her vision for the company.  Such clarity enables others to provide more effective input regarding company matters.
  • You AND Others Will Take the Company Seriously: Detailed business plans impress creditors and lending officers.  What’s more, they satisfy you psychologically since others are taking you and your business seriously.
  • More Capital:  Business plans often help you raise additional capital for your company.  The reason for this stems from the fact that since business plans force you to focus on accounts receivable, sometimes you free up additional funds.

So how do you construct a business plan?  What should you include?  Business plans generally consist of the following:

  1. A Statement of Your Company’s Objectives
  2. Your Company’s Strengths & Weaknesses
  3. Your Company’s Position in the Marketplace
  4. The Future Direction of Your Company
  5. Other Critical Issues Worth Considering

Before formulating your business plan, it is always helpful to consult other professionals such as your CPA and/or Attorney.  However, there is no magic formula, and your business plan should reflect your company’s needs and be specific to your line of work.

We Have to Litigate This Across the Pond? A look at the recent ruling in the Fourth Circuit case, Albemarle Corp. v. AstraZeneca UK Ltd.

January 12, 2011

Filed under: Contract Law — jrvann @ 5:22 pm

James R. Vann

It is always interesting when a court holds that the laws of another country should apply, and such was the ruling in Albemarle Corp. v. AstraZeneca UK Ltd.  After examining the contract between the two parties, the Court held that even though the contract’s forum selection clause would have been allowed under American law and the lawsuit could have been filed in South Carolina, the language of the forum clause required litigation to be brought in English court.

So what was this language that triggered this conclusion?  According to the contract between the two parties, the forum selection clause read: “shall be subject to English Law and the jurisdiction of the English High Court.”  And apparently, that is all it takes.

The Court’s analysis began by stating that when a federal court interprets a forum selection clause, federal law must be applied.  As such, federal law provides “an agreement conferring jurisdiction in one forum will not exclude jurisdiction in another unless specific language says so.” And interestingly, the phrase “English High Court” is meant to be “mandatory and exclusive”; referring only to the courts of England.

But the analysis does not end there.  The remaining question addressed by the Court is would it be unreasonable to enforce the clause this way? Generally, the only way to show unreasonableness in this context is to assert a public policy argument in favor of the forum the Court did not choose.  While South Carolina attempted such an argument, the Court disagreed, maintaining that the rules specifying forum should be adhered to, and any other result would do nothing but hinder future international business transactions.

Thus, when entering into contracts, always read the terms carefully.  Especially pay close attention to the details of what law applies and where the lawsuit can be tried.  If you have questions, please feel free to contact us.

 
 
 

The information contained on our website, video blogs, newsletters or blogs is provided as general information as a public service. Neither the presentation of this information or the use of this information creates an attorney-client relationship with the firm or any of the attorneys at Vann & Sheridan, LLP. The information provided in the website, blogs, video blogs and newsletters are based upon general information for North Carolina law.


The information contained in this website, video blogs, newsletters or blogs is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship and is therefore not legal advice. Legal advice should be tailored to the specific situation and fact pattern of each case, thus, nothing provided herein should be used as legal advice given the general nature of this information. Please note that Vann & Sheridan, LLP and Attorneys are unable to provide legal advice via email for people or companies who are not established clients of Vann & Sheridan Attorneys at Law. Sending us details of your legal issue(s) via email does not constitute an attorney-client relationship.